• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Medical Malpractice Litigation

Medical malpractice litigation is a complex and time-consuming. It is also expensive for both plaintiff and defendant.

To be able to claim monetary compensation in a malpractice lawsuit, the injured patient must prove that inadequate medical care resulted in injury. This involves establishing four legal elements such as a professional obligation, breach of duty, injury, and resulting damages.

Discovery

The most important part of a case involving medical negligence is the gathering of evidence. This can be done through written interrogatories or requests for documents. Interrogatories consist of questions that the opposing side must answer under oath. They can be used to establish facts that can be presented in a trial. Demands for the production of documents allow for tangible items to be retrieved, such as medical records or test results.

In many cases your attorney will record the deposition of the defendant physician in an audio recording of questions and answers. This allows your attorney to ask the witness or doctor questions that would not be permitted at trial. It can be very useful in cases with expert witnesses.

The information collected during pretrial discovery is used during trial to establish the following elements of your claim:

Breach of the standard care

Injury resulting from a breach of the standard of care

Proximate causation

A doctor's failure to use the degree of competence and expertise of doctors in their area of specialty and that proximately resulted in injury to a patient

Mediation

Medical malpractice trials are essential, but they also have many drawbacks. The cost, stress and time commitment required to conduct a trial can have a negative effect on plaintiffs. A trial can lead to humiliation and loss of prestige for defendant health care professionals. It can also have detrimental consequences for their careers and practice since the financial payments they receive as part of settlements before trial are reported to national databases of practitioners as well as the state medical licensing board and the medical malpractice law firms societies.

Mediation is the most cost-effective, time-efficient and risk-effective method of resolving a medical malpractice claim. Reducing the cost of a trial and avoiding potential loss of jury verdicts, mediation allows both parties to be more flexible in settlement negotiations.

Both parties must give brief details of the situation to the mediator prior mediation (a "mediation brief"). Parties will usually allow their communication to pass through their lawyer instead of directly between themselves at this stage, as direct communications can be used against them later in court. As the mediation proceeds it is a good idea for you to focus on your case's strengths and be prepared to recognize its weaknesses. This will enable the mediator to bridge any gaps in understanding and provide you with a reasonable offer.

Trial

Reformers of the tort system are seeking to create a system which compensates those injured by physician negligence quickly and without a lot of expense. While this isn't easy several states have implemented tort reform measures in order to lower costs and prevent frivolous medical malpractice claims.

The majority of doctors in United States have malpractice insurance as a means of protecting themselves from allegations of professional negligence. Some of these policies may be required by a medical or hospital group as a condition of the right to practice.

To be compensated for injuries resulting from negligence by a medical professional, the injured patient must prove that the physician did not meet the standards of care applicable to the profession they practice. This is referred to as proximate cause, and is an important part of the medical malpractice claim.

A lawsuit begins when a civil summons has been filed in the appropriate court. After this the parties must both engage in a process of disclosure. This involves written interrogatories and the production of documents such as medical records. Depositions (in which attorneys question deponents under oath) as well as requests for admission are also involved.

The burden of proving a medical malpractice case is extremely high. The damages awarded are calculated based on the actual economic loss such as lost income and the expense of future medical expenses and non-economic losses like suffering and pain. It is important to work with a seasoned lawyer when you are pursuing a medical malpractice claim.

Settlement

Settlements are the most popular way to resolve medical malpractice lawsuits. In general, the actual dollar value of a case is negotiated between the plaintiff and the defendants (often through or alongside the defendant's malpractice/professional liability insurer). The result is an amount for the injured patient, which is paid to the plaintiff's lawyer who deposits it into an escrow account. The lawyer subtracts the legal costs and case expenses in accordance with the representation agreement. He then gives the injured patients their compensation.

To prevail in a medical malpractice lawsuit, a patient must prove that a doctor or other healthcare provider breached their duty of care by not demonstrating the required level of expertise and skills in their field. They must also show that the victim suffered harm directly as a result of the violation.

The United States has a system of 94 federal district courts, which are the equivalent of state trial courts. each of these courts has an appointed judge and jury panel which hears cases. In certain circumstances, a medical negligence case could be transferred to one of the federal district courts. In the United States, physicians carry medical malpractice insurance as a way to safeguard themselves from claims of injury that was not intended. Physicians must understand the structure and functioning of our legal system in order to respond appropriately if a claim is brought against them.