• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 other states in a letter to Pornhub’s dad or mum company with concerns over content that includes underaged youngsters. As just lately reported, an employee for the corporate was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, where he admitted a "loophole." When uploading content to the site, customers are required to submit a photograph ID but aren't required to point out their face within the uploaded materials. The employee admitted there isn't any solution to verify the person uploading the picture ID is similar individual within the content. He replied, "Of course," when requested if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to upload content of their victims to make money. As you might be aware, numerous Federal and state legal guidelines forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We are concerned that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and probably other subsidiaries, may be proliferating the manufacturing and dissemination of CSAM by way of the ‘loophole’ identified by your employee. Please present us with an evidence of this ‘loophole;’ whether or not Aylo and its subsidiaries do, in fact, permit content creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content material; and, in that case, whether Aylo is taking measures to change this coverage to ensure that no youngsters or other victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that had been ahead of their time may help us to understand whether we are actually ready to live on the earth we are making. Speculative fiction followers know that you can create an entire world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to describe a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a whole alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their every element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that characterize a coherent reality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the heart. Creating objects in the real world is nearly precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a threat. When we create one thing new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of help it can have on the earth during which it emerges and the ability it should remake that world.

When a product fails because it was "ahead of its time," that normally implies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet laptop, though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological growth provided better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And though anyone thinking about a pill had most likely been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one factor that actually ready the world for the tablet laptop was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world in which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to mobile computing is one prepared for a bridge device between a small cell display screen and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences that are commonplace right this moment made their debuts in products that didn’t actually succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, however because the world wasn’t quite prepared and so they weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report told us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 participant, in fact; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It also wasn’t the first really good or really profitable one; the iPod really ought to get the credit for that. But, it did danger its identity on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to just weren’t ready for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating however quick death after a well known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us need.

But almost a decade later, every main tech company is both making a face pc or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which over and over. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in fact, like the actual first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the primary fuel powered car car launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it turns out that the basics of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental thought of transmitting image and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (long before any of us have been warned by The Jetsons that video phones would power us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many a long time). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.