• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 other states in a letter to Pornhub’s parent company with concerns over content that includes underaged youngsters. As lately reported, an employee for the corporate was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, where he admitted a "loophole." When importing content to the positioning, users are required to submit a photograph ID but will not be required to show their face within the uploaded materials. The worker admitted there isn't a technique to confirm the individual importing the photo ID is identical particular person in the content. He replied, "Of course," when asked if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to add content of their victims to earn money. As you might be aware, various Federal and state legal guidelines forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We are involved that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and presumably different subsidiaries, may be proliferating the production and dissemination of CSAM by way of the ‘loophole’ identified by your employee. Please provide us with an evidence of this ‘loophole;’ whether Aylo and its subsidiaries do, in actual fact, permit content creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content; and, if that's the case, whether or not Aylo is taking measures to vary this policy to make sure that no kids or other victims are being abused for profit on any of its platforms.

Inventions that have been ahead of their time can assist us to understand whether we're really ready to stay in the world we're making. Speculative fiction followers know that you could create an entire world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to describe a whole galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her each element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that represent a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the real world is sort of precisely the same; that’s why invention is a risk. When we create one thing new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the balance of help it will have on this planet during which it emerges and the facility it should remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that normally implies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet pc, although his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological growth supplied higher hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And though anybody concerned about a pill had probably been prepared for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one thing that basically ready the world for the tablet laptop was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion individuals used them. A world through which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to mobile computing is one ready for a bridge device between a small cellular display and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which are commonplace right now made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t actually succeed. Not because they weren’t good concepts, however as a result of the world wasn’t quite ready they usually weren’t powerful enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls almost 15 years before Minority Report informed us all to count on them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 player, of course; that distinction goes to the fully unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary really good or actually profitable one; the iPod actually should get the credit score for that. But, it did danger its identification on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to simply weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was launched in 2013 and died a humiliating however fast death after a well-known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a actuality much creepier than any of us need.

But almost a decade later, each main tech company is either making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, after which time and again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, in actual fact, like the precise first vehicle - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the primary gasoline powered vehicle automobile introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the fundamentals of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The basic concept of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy earlier than any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would drive us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the first public video call from Washington, D.C.