• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Last week, Utah Attorney General Sean D. Reyes joined 23 different states in a letter to Pornhub’s mother or father company with issues over content material that includes underaged kids. As lately reported, an worker for the company was captured on video by an undercover journalist discussing Pornhub’s moderation practices, the place he admitted a "loophole." When importing content to the location, users are required to submit a photo ID but should not required to indicate their face within the uploaded material. The worker admitted there isn't a method to affirm the person importing the photograph ID is identical particular person in the content. He replied, "Of course," when requested if rapists and human traffickers use this loophole to add content of their victims to earn cash. As you're conscious, varied Federal and state legal guidelines forbid the creation and distribution of CSAM (Child Sexual Abuse Material.) We are concerned that Aylo and its subsidiary Pornhub, and possibly different subsidiaries, could also be proliferating the production and dissemination of CSAM by way of the ‘loophole’ recognized by your worker. Please present us with an evidence of this ‘loophole;’ whether Aylo and its subsidiaries do, actually, permit content material creators and performers to obscure their faces in uploaded content material; and, if that's the case, whether Aylo is taking measures to change this policy to make sure that no youngsters or different victims are being abused for revenue on any of its platforms.

Inventions that had been forward of their time can help us to know whether we are truly able to reside on the planet we're making. Speculative fiction followers know you could create a complete world out of only a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to describe an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each detail - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that characterize a coherent reality beneath them. If that actuality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the real world is almost exactly the identical; that’s why invention is a risk. Once we create something new - truly, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of help it may have on the planet in which it emerges and the facility it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually implies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could possibly be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet pc, although his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now mostly forgotten. In hindsight, it’s straightforward to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement supplied better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And despite the fact that anyone curious about a tablet had probably been ready for one since even before the MessagePad because of the Star Trek universe being filled with PADDs, the one factor that actually prepared the world for the pill laptop was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world in which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to mobile computing is one ready for a bridge gadget between a small cellular display and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences which might be commonplace in the present day made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t actually succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good concepts, however as a result of the world wasn’t fairly ready they usually weren’t highly effective sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls virtually 15 years before Minority Report advised us all to anticipate them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 participant, in fact; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or really successful one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit for that. But, it did threat its id on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was offered to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast demise after a well-known tech bro wore it within the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a actuality much creepier than any of us want.

But nearly a decade later, each major tech company is either making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, actually, like the actual first car - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the primary gas powered automobile vehicle introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the term "battery" in 1749, but it surely wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta built one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries were understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The essential thought of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates back to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would power us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video name from Washington, D.C.