• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Inventions that were forward of their time may help us to understand whether we are truly able to dwell on the earth we are making. Speculative fiction followers know you can create an entire world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can begin to explain an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and xhamster pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for a whole alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each element - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that represent a coherent reality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the real world is nearly precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a danger. After we create something new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the stability of help it will have on this planet in which it emerges and the ability it must remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that normally signifies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill pc, even though his Newton MessagePad failed quickly after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological development supplied higher hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And despite the fact that anybody occupied with a tablet had most likely been ready for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being crammed with PADDs, the one factor that actually ready the world for the tablet computer was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a cell phone. By 2010, 5 billion people used them. A world in which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cell computing is one ready for a bridge system between a small cell screen and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, of course, isn’t alone. So many merchandise and technologies that are commonplace at this time made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, but because the world wasn’t quite ready and they weren’t highly effective enough to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years earlier than Minority Report instructed us all to anticipate them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 player, of course; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the first really good or actually successful one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit for that. But, it did danger its id on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to just weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating however quick dying after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computers are made for a actuality a lot creepier than any of us need.

But almost a decade later, every major tech company is both making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then time and again. There are, of course, many older examples. Much older ones, in truth, just like the precise first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the primary fuel powered car automobile launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, nevertheless it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries had been understood and in use over 2,000 years in the past! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The essential idea of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (lengthy before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would power us into a falseness that anticipated our perfectly curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not yet President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.

New York City. This early system used a closed circuit system, but within a few many years, Bell Labs managed to create equipment that could make use of the country’s present phone strains. This is what Bell Telephone introduced to the world on the 1964 World’s Fair, the PicturePhone. By that time, it was prepared for hype, but not use. It took just a few extra years of anticipation-building for Bell Telephone to get their product ready. But they didn’t hold again on their marketing. In probably the most implausible examples of product placement in cinema of all time, Bell Telephone was prominently featured in a scene from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A space Odyssey in 1969. That was Bell’s manner of saying, give us thirty years or so - not only will you be PicturePhoning cross-nation, you’ll be calling house, too! A yr later, the PicturePhone was demonstrated in public. The first name using the first client-ready PicturePhone was made by the Mayor of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to the chairman of Alcoa, one of the city’s most necessary manufacturers.