• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Inventions that were forward of their time will help us to know whether we are really able to stay in the world we are making. Speculative fiction fans know you could create a whole world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to describe an entire galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and pill can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-constructing isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for his or her every detail - but hinting at them by highlighting mere sides that represent a coherent actuality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its stories are endearing to the guts. Creating objects in the real world is almost precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a risk. When we create one thing new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of support it could have in the world through which it emerges and the ability it will have to remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually signifies that its makers succeeded at world-building, not invention. It could be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the tablet laptop, even though his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now largely forgotten. In hindsight, it’s easy to see why Ive’s pad succeeded where Gassée’s did not: twenty years of technological improvement provided better hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And even though anyone keen on a pill had most likely been prepared for one since even earlier than the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being stuffed with PADDs, the one thing that actually ready the world for the pill pc was the mobile phone. In 1993, hardly anybody had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world in which over 70% of its inhabitants is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge system between a small mobile screen and a big stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many products and technologies which are commonplace immediately made their debuts in merchandise that didn’t truly succeed. Not as a result of they weren’t good ideas, however because the world wasn’t quite ready and they weren’t powerful sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years earlier than Minority Report advised us all to expect them… ’re still not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the primary portable MP3 player, after all; that distinction goes to the utterly unknown MPMan F10, released in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary actually good or actually profitable one; the iPod actually should get the credit score for that. But, it did risk its identification on a monthly subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was sold to simply weren’t ready for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast demise after a widely known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality a lot creepier than any of us want.

But almost a decade later, each main tech company is either making a face computer or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and xnxx then over and over again. There are, after all, many older examples. Much older ones, the truth is, just like the actual first car - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century before the first gas powered vehicle automobile introduced by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, however it wasn’t until half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries were understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favorite one is the PicturePhone. The fundamental concept of transmitting picture and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (long before any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video telephones would force us into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many decades). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.

New York City. This early system used a closed circuit system, but within a number of many years, Bell Labs managed to create tools that might make use of the country’s existing phone traces. This is what Bell Telephone introduced to the world on the 1964 World’s Fair, the PicturePhone. By that point, it was prepared for hype, but not use. It took a number of more years of anticipation-constructing for Bell Telephone to get their product ready. But they didn’t hold back on their marketing. In probably the most implausible examples of product placement in cinema of all time, Bell Telephone was prominently featured in a scene from Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A space Odyssey in 1969. That was Bell’s approach of claiming, give us thirty years or so - not only will you be PicturePhoning cross-country, you’ll be calling space, too! A year later, the PicturePhone was demonstrated in public. The primary call using the first consumer-prepared PicturePhone was made by the Mayor of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania to the chairman of Alcoa, one of the city’s most vital manufacturers.