• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Hell back in '09 Pornhub was running smooth on an analogous stack with only a few servers (when you think about the site visitors).If you happen to ask me most of what was "invented" after 2004 is stuff invented by Google/Facebook who are realistically the one ones needing it, however they saw a possibility to scoop up market share in dev in order that they marketed their stack as "bleeding edge". The only factor bleeding is my eyes after i see one thing that could be wiped up in a typical PHP/Python/Ruby stack but instead is made with so many dependencies and third celebration library that you simply marvel if the dude who wrote it really knows programming or if he simply glued cool techs together as a result of Techcrunch and HackerNews say they are cool.But yes, the smaller players are often using outdated stuff, then again 99% of the web is. Hence why Wordpress is still a thing.And as a former Lead Dev of Pornhub, I can guarantee you that tech peeps positively are conscious of the bleeding edge of tech, simply that almost all have a tendency to not purchase the hype.

Inventions that were forward of their time might help us to understand whether or not we're actually ready to live on this planet we are making. Speculative fiction fans know you can create a whole world out of just a handful of objects. A lightsaber can start to explain a complete galaxy far, far away; a handheld communicator, phaser, and tablet can depict a star-trekking utopia; a black monolith can stand in for an entire alien civilization. World-building isn’t about creating imaginary worlds from scratch - accounting for their each element - however hinting at them by highlighting mere aspects that symbolize a coherent reality beneath them. If that reality is convincing, then the world is inhabitable by the imagination and its tales are endearing to the center. Creating objects in the real world is nearly precisely the identical; that’s why invention is a threat. Once we create one thing new - really, categorically, conceptually new - we place a wager on the steadiness of help it will have on this planet wherein it emerges and the power it should remake that world.

When a product fails as a result of it was "ahead of its time," that usually signifies that its makers succeeded at world-constructing, not invention. It may very well be argued that Jean-Louis Gassée, not Jony Ive, invented the pill laptop, regardless that his Newton MessagePad failed soon after it launch in 1993 and is now principally forgotten. In hindsight, it’s simple to see why Ive’s pad succeeded the place Gassée’s didn't: twenty years of technological growth provided higher hardware, screens, batteries, software, and connectivity. And although anybody fascinated by a tablet had in all probability been ready for one since even before the MessagePad due to the Star Trek universe being full of PADDs, the one thing that basically ready the world for the pill pc was the cell phone. In 1993, hardly anyone had a mobile phone. By 2010, 5 billion folks used them. A world through which over 70% of its population is already accustomed to cellular computing is one ready for a bridge device between a small cellular display and a large stationary one.

The Newton MessagePad, in fact, isn’t alone. So many products and applied sciences that are commonplace at this time made their debuts in products that didn’t really succeed. Not because they weren’t good ideas, however as a result of the world wasn’t quite prepared they usually weren’t powerful sufficient to make it so. The Nintendo Power Glove anticipated gestural interfaces and controls nearly 15 years earlier than Minority Report informed us all to expect them… ’re nonetheless not there. Microsoft’s Zune wasn’t the first portable MP3 player, of course; that distinction goes to the completely unknown MPMan F10, launched in 1997. It additionally wasn’t the primary really good or actually successful one; the iPod actually ought to get the credit for porn that. But, it did danger its id on a month-to-month subscription music service that the MP3 hoarders it was bought to only weren’t prepared for. Google Glass was released in 2013 and died a humiliating but fast dying after a well known tech bro wore it in the shower, reminding the world that face-mounted computer systems are made for a reality much creepier than any of us need.

But nearly a decade later, every main tech firm is both making a face laptop or is rumored to be making one. Times change. Things change. People change. The World Changes. In that order, and then over and over again. There are, in fact, many older examples. Much older ones, in reality, like the actual first automobile - powered by steam - created by Nicolas-Joseph Cugnot over a century earlier than the primary gasoline powered car automobile launched by Karl Friedrich Benz. Benjamin Franklin coined the time period "battery" in 1749, nevertheless it wasn’t till half a century later that Alessandro Volta constructed one. And, it seems that the basics of batteries have been understood and in use over 2,000 years ago! But my favourite one is the PicturePhone. The basic idea of transmitting image and audio over wire dates again to the 1870s (long earlier than any of us were warned by The Jetsons that video phones would pressure us right into a falseness that anticipated our completely curated Zoom backgrounds by many many years). In 1927, Herbert Hoover (not but President) made the primary public video call from Washington, D.C.