• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Introduction:
The prevalence of online gambling and its adverse consequences have prompted the implementation of various self-exclusion schemes, such as Gamstop, in the United Kingdom. However, a growing number of online casinos have emerged that operate outside of this self-exclusion program. This observational research aims to explore the reasons for the popularity of UK casinos not on Gamstop and shed light on the potential implications of these platforms for individuals facing gambling-related issues.

Methodology:
This research utilized a qualitative approach, primarily relying on online sources, online gambling forums, and public testimonies to gather observational data. By analyzing user experiences, opinions, and factors contributing to engagement with UK casinos not on Gamstop, we aimed to understand the allure of these platforms.

Results and Discussion:

1. Gambling Accessibility: The primary motivation reported by users was the availability of gambling options despite being enrolled in Gamstop. These platforms enable individuals to circumvent self-exclusion measures, often resulting from impulse or addiction-related behaviors. The accessibility of these casinos offered them an outlet to engage in their preferred form of entertainment or obtain a quick financial fix.
   

1. Bonus and Reward System: Through our observations, it became evident that UK casinos not on Gamstop tend to offer enticing bonuses and reward systems. These schemes attract individuals who may be seeking extra incentives to gamble or recover losses. Participants expressed that these additional benefits often overshadowed concerns about self-exclusion.
   

1. Privacy and anonymity: Users frequently mentioned that UK casinos not on Gamstop provided a sense of privacy and anonymity, as they were not linked to their self-exclusion enrollment. This anonymity allowed them to continue gambling without the fear of intervention or judgement from family, friends, or authorities.
   

1. Game Variation and Access to Excluded Game Types: Respondents reported that these platforms often offer a wider range of games compared to regulated UK casinos. Many participants cited the ability to play restricted or banned games, such as high-stakes poker, as a key reason for their engagement.
   

1. Lack of Alternative Support: Surprisingly, a significant number of respondents indicated a lack of effective alternatives for addressing their gambling-related issues. This absence of accessible counseling, support, or treatment options led them to seek unwelcome refuge in UK casinos not on Gamstop as a result.
   

Implications:
The observations from this study have several implications for gamblers and policymakers alike. Firstly, it highlights the limitations of self-exclusion schemes like Gamstop, necessitating comprehensive and more rigid regulations to prevent individuals from engaging in unregulated gambling activities. Secondly, it emphasizes the urgent need for increased provision of support services for individuals struggling with gambling issues, both for those enrolled in self-exclusion programs and those who are not.

Conclusion:
This observational study sheds light on the various factors driving individuals to engage with UK casinos not on Gamstop. The findings emphasize the need for more robust regulations and support services to protect vulnerable individuals from potential harm associated with unregulated gambling.