• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Either way, capital is on the sidelines that would otherwise be in play and creating jobs, and THIS PRESIDENT's administration shows no interest in reversing the trend. Nearly ALL of them use their accumulated wealth to create jobs, in fact. Yes, but how many millionaires actually do use that accumulated wealth to create jobs? ActiveOxygen - this system cleans your most delicate fabrics at low wash temperatures, protecting their colour while eliminating 99.9 per cent of the bacteria and germs found in clothes, without the use of any chemical additives. I do agree that, while it's nice to have fancy devices, it's wrong to be constantly hunting for The Newest And Bestest Devices Ever. And pewter grey scrubs that's how we get to the point where employers pay their laborers less than the "cost of reproduction", as Marx would have it - when in a market economy labor can be exchanged for $7.50/hr, but it actually costs $12/hr to keep the laborer alive and sheltered, it's just wilfull blindness to anything but exchange value that allows people to say the work is only "worth" $7.50. Even nonprofits and academic researchers have to measure their capability and sustainability in terms of operating budgets, grants, and donors, so social goods wind up being translated into value relations.

Not so much that labor is another currency, but it is reduced to exchange value measurable by money ONLY, which means that it can be made nearly worthless in the market regardless of the cost and effect it has on the person who performs it. The national tea company Çaykur is in the market with its iced tea brand 'Didi'. They involved the altruistic fight for software freedoms versus free market capitalism, and signifying more than just visuals and methods of rendering CSS. It doesn't matter what it is we will have more. You might have noticed that none of these tasks is necessarily for the shy or meek. Also, using simple, basic litter might suit your cat more than the fancy deodorizing litters. I believe that when you reduce your music to something that's just on an mp3 player's drive, with nothing more tangible than a tiny thumbnail graphic, and always take it on the go, that does cheapen the music. True, but what about the person who says, "My CD player doesn't work--I think I'll buy an MP3 player and rip all my CDs to it?" That's what I did. As far as minimalism is concerned, what's the difference between owning a CD player or an iPod?

Sounds more like technophobia than minimalism. One significant illness or accident, with time in the hospital, will make it melt like snow in August. Doesn't seem like that would be too difficult. I wonder if this has anything to do with the way CEO salaries have skyrocketed in the US over the past few decades, especially as compared to salaries in other prosperous countries that have stronger health safety nets? The ascendance of the iPod over the CD is part of the mindset of haste and expecting something for nothing (and is living proof that most people are lives and thieves by inclination, because statistically, how many pay for their mp3s?). Nearly all of those very wealthy people created jobs-- for bankers. Kudos to you if you got this one right, since the photo shows a wildy overstyled custom version of the Italian mid-engine sports car that was made from 1971-1991. Automotive connoisseurs prefer the earlier models for their cleaner design, which, by the way, was created by an American, Tom Tjaarda while working for the Italian design firm Ghia. One version told the story of Dora the rabbit and her friends who lived in the woods.

What we've had for a long time is care that gets rationed by insurance companies, who are out to maximize profit by minimizing the number of justified claims that they pay. Let's reject this facile notion that the only organizations that exist to make the Earth a better place are "charities." The profit motive makes tremendous amounts of good available to many. Hell, even these days if you posit (which qb does not, but for the sake of argument) that so-called organic foods are "good," then you must concede that so-called organic farmers are, through their profit motives, making the world a better place, even if they don't give their produce away at cost. Now, it's obvious - or it seems obvious to me - that a better solution is to find a way to even out the risks among everyone. You're right. I don't know if we can even try to talk without money at this point.