• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

But ChatGPT seems to have sensed my irritation, and gone totally on the defensive. ChatGPT is a generative AI chatbot that may reply virtually any query you've-simply as if Google were a person you may have a informal dialog with. Creative writing: If caught in a rut, you may ask ChatGPT to share artistic prompts for stories, poems, and scripts. When you’re working on a bit of code, share it and ask for suggestions. In that case, please do SHARE it with family and friends to help keep the net neighborhood safe and knowledgeable - and consider leaving a like or remark below. Precise, clear prompts help ChatGPT in het Nederlands ship extra accurate, participating, and helpful responses, whether for content material creation, downside-solving, or interactive storytelling. Tip: Don’t hesitate to refine your prompts if the initial response isn’t passable. The response is then decoded from numerical vectors again into text, and the generated textual content is sent as the model’s response to the consumer. ChatGPT: I apologize if my earlier response was not useful.

ChatGPT: I apologize for any confusion caused by my earlier responses. I regret the confusion brought about. What the little fucker has finished right here is make up a composite reference. So, right here is what I see as a core problem with ChatGPT. If you cannot log in because of this concern, you may often see an error that says "You tried signing in as (your electronic mail handle) utilizing a password, which is not the authentication methodology you used during join," "Wrong authentication technique," or "There may be already a consumer with this e-mail address." This means you will must click on either Continue with Google or Continue with Microsoft on the sign-in screen as an alternative of coming into your e mail handle and password. Note that clearing your browser knowledge will signal you out of most web sites. Instead of looking out the net for answers once you ask it a query, ChatGPT knows the reply based mostly on its coaching knowledge. To answer your question, the age determination of the Manuherikia Group is based on numerous scientific studies and publications. To reply your question extra specifically, the age determination of the Manuherikia Group is based on several scientific studies and publications. To reply your query extra specifically, the age of the Manuherikia Group is determined by radiometric courting methods, resembling uranium-lead dating, applied to the rocks inside the formation.

What was it doing between this question and the last? Lake Manuherikia, and certainly, the Manuherikia Group (several millions of years ago), well predate the last ice age (solely tens of thousands of years in the past). This contradicts the previous response, but is ‘better’, as a result of at the very least it’s now talking about tens of millions of years, not 1000's, ChatGPT Gratis and the Miocene, not the ‘last ice age’. It’s chosen authors who are actual New Zealand geologists (and a few, like Suggate, who have published on coal - a topic at least connected with the Manuherikia Group), paired them up with precise scientific journals - journals that have, every now and then, printed articles on the Manuherikia Group and then thrown in some random volume and web page numbers. It’s not appropriate, because the Manuherikia Group continued to be deposited effectively after the Early Miocene. Therefore, the age of the Manuherikia Group is roughly between 23 and sixteen million years previous. How outdated is the Manuherikia Group? This paper describes the geological traits and age willpower of the Manuherikia Group based on radiometric dating of rocks and correlation with different geological formations. The unique reference for the age of the Manuherikia Group may be traced again to the work of latest Zealand geologists who studied the rocks and fossils of the region in the late nineteenth and early 20th centuries.

ChatGPT replied: The Late Cretaceous and Early Paleocene age for the Manuherikia Group relies on radiometric relationship of the rocks and correlation with other geological formations around the world. The age willpower of Late Cretaceous to Early Paleocene for the Manuherikia Group has been established through a number of scientific studies and publications, including a 2014 analysis article by Florindo et al. The Late Cretaceous to Early Paleocene age determination of the Manuherikia Group has been widely accepted within the geological community and is supported by other scientific studies. Gondwana Research is circuitously related to the age dedication of the Manuherikia Group. Then I went to the Gondwana Research journal web site and appeared through all the 2014 papers. The new Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, volume 19, situation 2, was printed in 1976. But has no paper by Suggate, the Manuherikia Group, or any paper operating from pages 199-213. There are no papers in the journal by Suggate on the Manuherikia Group. It is, simply, made up (For starters, New Zealand Geological Survey Bulletin, 99 is: Johnston MR. 1990. Geology of the St Arnaud district, southeast Nelson, Sheet N29AC. One such publication is the brand new Zealand Geological Survey Bulletin 99, which offers a detailed geological description of the Manuherikia Group and its age determination based on radiometric dating methods.