• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A lot of organizations and individual professionals are promoting business by Bitcoin news. So, I’m not sure this has made a lot of progress, but this can still make progress in the past months, but I haven’t been tracking that closely. And on trampoline, I think that, again, people expressed interest in implementing trampoline, but I’m still waiting to see if this actually catches on, because many people are interested, but it still doesn’t seem to meet the bar for implementation in the short term. Greg Sanders: Okay, so in case people are wondering, yeah, so the LN-Symmetry implementation is what I consider complete from a de-risking perspective. This is one example of blockchain in practice, but many other forms of blockchain implementation exist. Binance is one of the fastest growing exchanges in the cryptocurrency market, being the 10th biggest crypto exchange in only 5 months. But as well, I mean, the biggest one is requirements for something like anyprevout, right? Binance has basically become the biggest bank in the crypto-economy, minus regulatory stands and customer safety precautions, that is.

It made a big news when the largest bank of Japan made its own cryptocurrency, named "MUFG coin" while doing research about blockchain and distributed ledger technology. The NYSE is by far world’s largest stock market, trading 1.5 billion shares a day-or nearly one-in-four of all equity transactions. If some of the disappeared transactions were yours, how would this affect your opinion on Bitcoins? So, perhaps a question to Greg and t-bast, how would you summarize this meta-spec process discussion? Greg or t-bast, is there anything that you think the audience would benefit from knowing about those discussions? On the spec itself, there was a proposal to move to working groups to split the specification into different working groups. So, since we’re still a very small team, maybe at some point, I hope that we are way too many specification writers, and then we need to split into different working groups. We showed that the Lightning Network, as a second-layer solution, most elegantly solves the scalability problem by both preserving all of Bitcoin’s benefits while at the same time scaling it way beyond what any base-layer solutions promise.

This prevents an outside observer examining block chain data from assuming all inputs in that transaction belong to the same user (e.g.1). It’s an independent blockchain that could run even if BNB Beacon Chain went offline. While the BNB Chain offers a number of advantages, m.blog.naver.com such as faster and more secure transactions, enhanced user experience, and increased programmability and customization capabilities, it does come with some potential drawbacks. You can instantly buy any of these coins or trade hundreds more on the exchange. We want to make sure that we use IRC more for day-to-day communication, and to make sure that because right now, communication has been scattered across different smaller groups who are implementing different features. So, let’s say it’s your turn right now, I want to make a payment, then I say, "Hey, I know it’s your turn, but can I do an update right now? So right now, we are just going to keep working like we’ve been doing for the past few years, try to make sure that we discuss on IRC a lot more, so that many people can see all of the small nitty-gritty details of how every feature is moving forward.

And then async payments and trampoline, this is a longer-term effort, because it requires a lot of things that we’re working on but are not complete yet, before we can actually really do async payments. And that’s consensus change, and people working on spec details aren’t going to spend a lot of time lobbying for consensus changes, because they’re understandable. Bastien Teinturier: Hmm, on the first one, it was just about using threshold signatures, and I think there are cryptographic details to iron out before it becomes a real possibility. Bastien Teinturier: I think mostly that it’s starting to work fine and we’re starting to have good velocity on the spec process on some of the important features. Greg Sanders: No. I haven’t been as deep in the argumentation like Bastien. The portals like these are run by professional teams who have deep knowledge of the industry. The remaining piece would be things like the mempool policy work, which we’re continuing to work on as a necessary precondition. But to be honest, everyone’s feeling, I think, was that we’re not a big enough team of people actually working seriously on the specification to be able to split into many working groups.