• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

Therefore, it but natural to subscribe to newsletter providing the most updated Bitcoin news from various parts of the world. Some websites allow users to video chat in order to practise conversation, which is very cool because you get to meet people from all over the world while also earning money. With standard lightning fees, you only get paid when liquidity is used. This compensates the company for the case where their liquidity is NOT being used. FWIW, the initial use case that I hinted at in the OP is for lightning. It’s also fast and secure, making it a great option for users that use Binance streaming services regularly. One of the things people sometimes claim about bitcoin as an asset, is that it's got both the advantage of having been first to market, but also that if some altcoin comes along with great new ideas, then those ideas can just be incorporated into bitcoin too, so bitcoin can preserve it's lead even from innovators. A particular advantage of lisp-like approaches is that they treat code and data exactly the same -- so if we're trying to leave the option open for a transaction to supply some unexpected code on the witness stack, then lisp handles that really naturally: you were going to include data on the stack anyway, and code and data are the same, so you don't have to do anything special at all.

FOLD and in exactly the same context, I was wondering what the simplest possible language that had some sort of map construction was -- I mean simplest in a "practical engineering" sense; I think Simplicity already has the Euclidean/Peano "least axioms" sense covered. To me, it seems like chia lisp is a better answer to the problem here than the Simplicity language. Both those essentially give you a lisp-like language -- lisp is obviously all about lists, and a binary tree is just made of things or pairs of things, and pairs of things are just another way of saying "car" and "cdr". One approach is to just define a new version of the language via the tapleaf version, defining new opcodes however we like. To level-up from that, instead of putting byte strings on a stack, you could have some other data structure than a stack -- eg one that allows nesting. The thing that's most appealing to me about bitcoin script as it stands (beyond "it works") is that it's really pretty simple in an engineering sense: it's just a "forth" like system, where you put byte strings on a stack and have a few operators to manipulate them.

However, whether you do or don't support that softfork, as far as the rest of the script is concerned, the expression will either fail entirely or evaluate as zero; so anyone who doesn't support the softfork can just replace it with zero and continue on, treating it as if it had costed "cost" units. The Cost range of binance clone script various according to the demands and requirements of any client for their features and security add-ons. Well, m.blog.naver.com a range of subjects from pirates (uh huh), to presidents (well that follows naturally, doesn't it), sport, music stars, countries, the solar system, space travel and more. Coinbase supports customers in over 30 countries, including the United States, Europe, UK, Singapore, and Canada. Gemini is a New York-based Bitcoin exchange, open to residents of the United States, UK, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore and South Korea. Since the collapse of FTX in early November, an investor located in Singapore whose identity has been changed has stated he has lost more than fifty percent of his net worth. Seems worth looking into, at least.

For example, rather than the streaming-sha256 approach in Elements, where you could write: "a" SHA256INITIALIZE "b" SHA256UPDATE "c" SHA256UPDATE "d" SHA256FINALIZE to get the sha256 of "abcd" without having to CAT them first (important if they'd potentially overflow the 520B stack item limit), in chia lisp you write: (sha256 "a" "b" "c" "d") which still has the benefit of streaming the inputs into the function, but only adds a single opcode, doesn't involve representing the internal sha256 midstate on the stack, and generally seems easier to understand, at least to me. You don’t get paid when it is NOT being used. The idea was to implement a monthly service fee that requires the user to pay a fixed amount if the channel isn’t being used. This would mean also being able to pull information about the utxo being spent to obtain its amount and scriptpubkey, which are committed to wit ANYPREVOUT. And while I've never really coded in lisp at all, my understanding is that its biggest problems are all about doing things efficiently at large scales -- but script's problem space is for very small scale things, so there's at least reason to hope that any problems lisp might have won't actually show up for this use case.