• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

More specifically they are social relational properties, whereas being means of production and being a man are not. Man is a zoon politikon (social animal) in the most literal sense: he is not only a social animal, but an animal that can be individuated only within society. According to Cohen, society is made up of people and productive forces. In concrete social reality it is rather the case that people are active. Things and relations are not purely external to each other, not absolutely distinct and separate. These relations, Cohen insists, are external to, separate and distinct from, the terms related: "the terms bound by relations do not belong to the structure those relations constitute". To make this point, Cohen appeals to the notion of a "relational property". The notion of a "relational property" to which Cohen appeals is no help to his case, it only confuses the issue. In response, no doubt, the objection will be made that I am misrepresenting the analytical approach and being unfair to Cohen in my criticisms.

"I guess that will be all, Mr. Giordini," he said. Just strap some sails onto a spacecraft, let them catch a few rays and the ingenious vessel will slowly, gradually, pick up speed as incoming photons transfer their momentum to the sail. In fact, if you place an unmanned probe in a close orbit around an asteroid, it will pull ever so slightly on the rock. Likewise, a stone axe has no place in our society as a productive force but only as a museum exhibit. Capital, he insists, is a particular sort of thing (a machine, say) placed in certain social relations; and, likewise, a slave is a different sort of thing (a person) in certain relations. They enter into social relations, they interact with other people and things according to more or less set patterns, they are active in their social roles; and, in so being, they produce and reproduce their social relations. And, in particular, historical materialism maintains that their social relations are internal and essential features of the nature of both people and productive forces. By properties of herbs, for instance, we understand determinations which not only are proper to something, but are the means whereby this something in its relations with other somethings maintains itself in its own peculiar way, counteracting the alien influences posited in it and making its determinations effective in the other.

The idea is that some properties - those material properties which make a man a man and a machine a machine - are more basic and essential (i.e. internal) than the "relational" properties. A man is a person in himself and essentially; only accidentally does occupy a particular social role and relate to others. A husband is a man related by marriage to a woman: he is not also a relationship of marriage. As Hegel says, properties are "the determinate relations of the thing to another thing; property exists only as a mode of relationship between them". The language Hegel uses here is doubtless strange and unfamiliar, but the idea that he is expressing is surely a clear and a profoundly important one. 10.3 Pocket courtesy: Players should refrain from moving or removing balls from their opponent’s pocket or scoring tray for any reason, except to spot a ball following a scratch or to sufficiently clear a pocket to permit entry of additional balls for an impending shot, and should only do so with respect for their opponent’s scoring preferences. In practice, the breaker does not ‘call his pocket’; their pocket selection is considered obvious by virtue of the orientation of their break.

2.2 The break: The opening break begins with ball in hand behind the head string line. If you bash the ball too hard, you get nowhere. When the last ball is pocketed, What is billiard cue the game is ended. The game is very difficult to play than what it seems. Individuals can purchase and invest in their own billiard equipment to ensure they get exactly the type of game play they want to experience. Cohen, in other words, accepts Hume’s premises: he accepts Hume’s fragmented picture of the world; but he is unwilling to accept Hume’s sceptical conclusion: "Though we cannot deduce social relationships from a material description, we can infer them more or less confidently, by dint of general or theoretical knowledge". By understanding the principles of motion and collisions in billiards, scientists and engineers can apply this knowledge to solve real-world problems and create more accurate simulations or models. The nylon/wool blend gave the billiard felt more stretch for a tighter installation and overall it was more durable and played faster than the obsolete woolen felt. In doing so, I shall at last be emerging from out of the undergrowth of abstract logical and philosophical argument into what, for most Marxists at least, will be more familiar terrain.