• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

So now we all know the entire strategy of bitcoin functioning and how Bitcoins can be utilized for making all kinds of actual transactions. Bitcoins are exchangeable for fiat forex via cryptocurrency exchanges and can be used to make purchases from merchants and retailers that settle for them. Greg Sanders: Yeah, if I can jump in. Mark Erhardt: So I’m wondering, one in every of the problems that seems to jump out after i hear you speaking about this is, what if one aspect keeps making updates but not concluding it? And we’ve at all times gone back and forth between these, because we don’t know if we should do a simpler model first and watch for later to do a much more complex model, or if we must always just bounce to the more advanced version proper now. Because we’ve at all times been discussing the truth that saying, having the channel announcement point to a particular onchain output, was fairly bad for privateness and that we may in all probability do better. So, those are things that we’ve at all times been just hand-wavy about how we might do this sooner or later. Read More: Amid value drops and elevated regulation, what’s the future of cryptocurrency?

But I don’t think we’ll permit you to have any form of multiplier, because considered one of the other ideas was that you possibly can also just announce some UTXOs that you simply personal, with the proof that you simply own them, with a complete worth of, for example, 2 bitcoin, after which that would grant you the flexibility to announce up to X times that in channels with out having to point to any particular onchain output. I didn’t assume it was too dangerous, but the one key distinction right look here is that for the fee channels with penalties as presently designed, it’s necessitating that you retailer these secret nonces ceaselessly till channel shut. These charts are cardinal a part of the entire affair as with them traders are able to foretell the movement near accuracy. But, realizing that the markets never close is a helpful safeguard to have. When you have one other Lightning-like channel specification that you just coded up or a customized channel type, you can even include that in this channel announcement and it'll just work. That’s why we’re not doing that proper now, and that’s why most people will just keep announcing the output that actually corresponds to the channel so that when it will get spent, folks truly discover it and can remove it from that graph and know that they can not route by that channel anymore.

I believe we’re going to persist with a simple model, the place you enable pointing to any type of output to pay in your channel. PTLC fixes that by ensuring that as a substitute of using the preimage of a SHA256 hash and its hash, we’re going to use elliptic curve factors and their non-public keys. This could appear unnecessary provided that BIP32 already offers extended private keys (xprvs) that may be shared between signing wallets. Maybe we can begin with t-bast. Can the channel stay open when the UTXO gets spent? And alternatively, how do you be sure that the same UTXO shouldn't be reused for the announcement; and what happens if that UTXO will get spent? So, will we must be conserving track of the UTXO really not being moved whereas it is the stand-in to have announced the channel? Mike Schmidt: The taproot and MuSig2 channel dialogue considerably leads into the updated channel announcement discussion and the way gossip protocol would need to be upgraded with a view to help transferring to P2TR outputs. So, we need to alter that, because we'd like to permit taproot, which implies permitting also enter, especially if we use MuSig2; we don’t need to reveal the interior keys.

And right now, it’s going to make use of the identical payment hash with all these nodes, which signifies that if someone owns two of the nodes in the path, they are studying data, and this is bad for privateness. Right now, everytime you ship a cost, this cost goes to undergo a number of nodes on the community. Bastien Teinturier: Sure. So right now, when we introduced the channel on the network, we explicitly introduced node IDs and the Bitcoin keys which can be inside the multisig 2-of-2, and folks verified that the output that we're referencing is definitely locked with the script hash of multisig 2-of-2 of these two keys, so you possibly can solely use it with scripts that actually comply with the format of Lightning channels with out taproot. Mike Schmidt: Murch or t-bast, some other comments on taproot and MuSig2 channels? Mike Schmidt: Go forward, Murch. Mike Schmidt: Next part from the Summit discussed PTLCs and redundant overpayments. Bastien Teinturier: Okay, so PTLCs are a change that is allowed by taproot and adaptor signatures.